Friday, December 4, 2009

ECCC: Are All Witnesses Treated Equally and Fairly?

By Sothida Sin

In the Cambodian court system there are judges, defense lawyers,
prosecutors, investigating judges and witnesses. The Extraordinary Chambers
in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), also known as the Khmer Rouge tribunal, is
a mixed trial staffed by Cambodians and United Nations officials that
follows the Cambodian court system. Like in Cambodian courts, witnesses are
considered crucial in disclosing to the ECCC what happened in a particular
period in the past. Only eye witnesses can tell past events. However, no
government officials, who are believed to have experienced and witnessed
past events, have been summoned to be witnesses and testify at the ECCC.
Below are students’ opinions regarding the treatment and summoning of
witnesses to testify at the Khmer Rouge tribunal. These students attend high
school at Krouch Chhmar High School in Kampong Cham province.

17-year-old Oudam says that all witnesses have to be treated equally; no
matter what background they are from and social status they have they must
accept the court’s invitation to be witnesses. A witness who refuses to
testify could make the court become biased; additionally, it is not right
for witnesses to reject the court’s requests. It also leads the country to
be less democratic. Although one is high-ranking in the government, he/she
must accept the court’s summons to testify in court for the sake of
transparency and fairness. Everyone has to be under the law because the
court is an independent institution. A witness is a mirror who can reflect
what happened in the past in order to seek justice for Khmer Rouge
survivors.

Menglaing, an 18-year-old eleventh grade student, says that the ECCC is not
independent from the government. The government dominates and influences the
court and witnesses are not treated equally. If ordinary people reject the
court’s summons, the court might bring them to the court. However, the court
does not take the same action with high-ranking government officials if they
reject the summons. This reflects the corruption in the court. This problem
needs to be addressed immediately to ensure that the court provides justice.
The court must be independent from the government and any high-ranking
official. “If one is summoned to testify in court, he/she needs to come and
cannot use his/her power to reject,” says Menglaing.

Ty is seventeen years old. He says that the court does not treat witnesses
fairly. Witnesses need to accept the court’s invitation. The court should
use every means possible to make sure that any witnesses invited come to
testify in court. Witnesses are important to provide justice to survivors
and to offer truth to the next generation. Ty also thinks that the ECCC is
corrupt since it cannot summon government officials to testify. However, the
court remains silent and does not give reasons for this to the public.

Chhuos Suoty, aged 17, mentions that “the court does not treat witnesses
fairly because it is a non-independent institution. Independent courts are
not under the influence of any official or institution. Witnesses need to
come at the request of this independent court.” If any official rejects the
court’s invitation, the court must take immediate action to force them to
come.

However, 19-year-old and twelfth grade high school student Silna describes
testifying in court as very important to providing truth to the court so
that judges can make a decision. Silna believes that the court does not
treat witnesses fairly because high-ranking government officials do not come
to testify in court and the court does not take any action to make them
come. This can mean that the court is not independent. The court should take
the same actions with the high-ranking officials who reject to testify as
they do with everyone else.

In order for witnesses to be treated fairly, the national courts and the
Khmer Rouge tribunal must be independent from the government. Furthermore,
the ECCC should seek other means to ensure that government officials who are
summoned to be witnesses at this mixed court testify. The ECCC should be a
model and an unbiased trial. As such, the court will be supported by the
public.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
Dara Duong was born in 1971 in Battambang province, Cambodia. His life changed forever at age four, when the Khmer Rouge took over the country in 1975. During the regime that controlled Cambodia from 1975-1979, Dara’s father, grandparents, uncle and aunt were executed, along with almost 3 million other Cambodians. Dara’s mother managed to keep him and his brothers and sisters together and survive the years of the Khmer Rouge regime. However, when the Vietnamese liberated Cambodia, she did not want to live under Communist rule. She fled with her family to a refugee camp on the Cambodian-Thai border, where they lived for more than ten years. Since arriving in the United States, Dara’s goal has been to educate people about the rich Cambodian culture that the Khmer Rouge tried to destroy and about the genocide, so that the world will not stand by and allow such atrocities to occur again. Toward that end, he has created the Cambodian Cultural Museum and Killing Fields Memorial, which began in his garage and is now in White Center, Washington. Dara’s story is one of survival against enormous odds, one of perseverance, one of courage and hope.