Anita Epstein, who was born in the Krakow ghetto in 1942, reflects on the
collective guilt experienced by post-war Germans and on her own inability to
see past the death she was spared.
Tags: Jewish world Israel news
It was more than 15 years ago, but I still remember the day clearly. My
husband and I hosted a dinner at our home for emerging young German leaders.
They were participating in an exchange program with the American Jewish
Committee that included a week in Washington, D.C. I viewed the evening as a
test of how I would deal with Germans - indeed, of whether I could deal with
them at all.
The Germans, after all, had murdered almost all of my family in the
Holocaust, to say nothing of their wanton slaughter of millions of other
Jews, gypsies, homosexuals and others. I escaped that gruesome fate myself
only because shortly after my birth in the Krakow ghetto, in November 1942,
my parents gave me away to be hidden by a Polish Catholic family. More than
a million Jewish children, however, were not so fortunate: They were
strangled or starved, shot or gassed, bashed against walls or tossed out
windows, burned in ovens or buried in mass graves.
I tried to behave myself that evening. I really did. But I could not help
myself: I asked a wispy young German woman with whom I was speaking whether
she thought she was capable of throwing a baby off a balcony.
She was stunned. "What do you mean?" I told her that Germans routinely had
thrown Jewish children off balconies during the Holocaust. Did she think she
could do something like that? She protested. She said that she was not even
alive during the Holocaust. How could I think such a thing?
Wouldn't I ever be able to forgive the Germans? She began to cry.
I told her that it was not hard for me to think such a thing. I think about
such things often. I think about how easily I could have been one of the
murdered babies. I think of how the Germans killed all pregnant Jewish women
they discovered in the ghetto along with so many others. I think of how my
mother avoided their clutches to bring me into this world and, after she
suffered terribly in four Nazi camps and returned from the brink of death,
found me again after the war. And I think of the father, grandparents,
uncles, aunts, cousins and others I will never know, of the postwar
anti-Semitism in Germany and Poland, and of the resentment heaped on me by
some Holocaust survivors whose own sons and daughters had perished. (When I
was older I realized that I was a constant reminder to them of their
inability to save their children. I evidently was being punished for
living.)
Despite all of this and more, I have managed to have a full life, if a
deeply scarred one. After several years spent chiefly in a displaced persons
camp in Germany, I came to America on a crammed troop ship, the U.S.S.
Taylor, and in New York survived a different kind of ghetto - Brooklyn's
Bedford-Stuyvesant. I married and raised two wonderful daughters who have
given me five marvelous grandchildren. I have done fulfilling work in
publishing, in teaching and, for 30 years, as a Washington lobbyist.
None of this, however, has been thanks to the Germans, who are responsible
only for the darkest corners of my life, including, among other things, my
regular nightmares, my survivor guilt (why was I spared?), and my persistent
fear of intruders and attackers. No, I cannot forgive the Germans. That's
God's job.
Of course, many people would disapprove of this view, and they can draw on
an extensive literature about the importance of forgiving, including texts
from the world's religions, pronunciations of literary lions and volumes
from modern psychology and psychiatry. For me, though, most of their
arguments miss the point. Consider perhaps the most well-worn dictum in
favor of letting bygones be bygones: Alexander Pope's "To err is human, to
forgive, divine." In my case I find it easily dismissible. This is not only
because it would be disgraceful to apply a remark about literary criticism -
the line is from Pope's 1711 "An Essay on Criticism," which is actually a
poem - to Germany's systematic extermination of more than 6 million innocent
people. Even more, it would be outrageous to characterize so immense an
abomination as "erring."
I am also unpersuaded by those who favor forgiveness because the act often
makes the person doing the forgiving feel better. That's a favorite of
psychiatrists and psychologists, who are of course dedicated to making their
patients feel better about themselves. Thus one can find works about how
bestowing forgiveness can lift a weight from your shoulders, set you free,
bring you peace and improve your physical health in the process. The problem
is that I have long felt tolerably well about myself. Indeed, for me, the
idea of forgiving those who perpetrated the Holocaust would have the
opposite effect: It would make it hard for me to live with myself, to get
out of bed and look in the mirror. I could not dishonor the memory of my
family members and the millions of other Holocaust victims by giving a free
pass to their murderers. That would only signal to other bestial beings that
they, too, would be forgiven if they were to commit genocide.
Granted, a good number of people have followed the
healing-through-forgiveness advice and benefited. They range from
passed-over employees with deep grievances and divorcées seeking revenge to
victims of childhood sex abuse and mothers in Northern Ireland who have had
to bury their sons. In the Jewish community, one of the most striking
examples is Eva Kor, a victim of Dr. Josef Mengele's vile genetic
"experiments" at Auschwitz on Jewish and Gypsy twins, dwarfs and others. The
subject of a documentary film called "Forgiving Dr. Mengele," Kor stood at
Auschwitz in the winter of 1995, 50 years after its liberation, and declared
that she was granting "amnesty to all Nazis who participated directly or
indirectly in the murder of my family and millions of others," including
Mengele.
So dramatic a declaration took the Jewish community aback and infuriated
other twins who had been Mengele victims. After all, the "Angel of Death,"
as the racial researcher was known, had brutalized and killed thousands. He
selected twins for "experiments" on heredity, relationships between racial
types and disease, on eye coloration and other questions raised by his
mentor, Otmar von Verschuer, a pathologist who was a leading proponent of
Nazi racial policies. Mengele put children through excruciating pain,
ordering surgeries, spinal taps and other procedures without anesthesia. He
had some twins infected with deadly diseases, others castrated, still others
injected in their eyes with chemicals and at least one set sewn together.
Many twins were killed with injections of phenol or chloroform into their
hearts, after which their bodies were dissected and their eyes and other
organs sent to Verschuer in Berlin. That is the man Kor wanted to forgive.
Whether she knew it or not, however, Kor had her own Jewish problem: Judaism
does not give her the ability to forgive Mengele or others. Judaic paths to
forgiveness are, of course, unlike those of other religions. In Judaism, a
person cannot obtain forgiveness from God for wrongs done to other people,
only for sins committed against God. For sins against others, Jewish law and
tradition require offenders to express remorse, genuinely repent, provide
recompense to victims if appropriate - and directly ask the victim, three
times, for forgiveness. Obviously, Josef Mengele did not repent, and he did
not beg Kor or other victims for forgiveness. Kor was thus mistaken when she
thought, and said, that she had the power to forgive Mengele. She did not,
at least so far as Judaism is concerned, and she certainly could not speak
for her family or other victims or forgive all other Nazis, only those who
specifically sinned against her.
Like anybody else, Kor naturally could come to terms personally with the
atrocities committed by Mengele and other Nazis. While that would not
absolve Mengele or anybody else, it could - and evidently did - help Kor. "I
felt a burden of pain was lifted from me," she has said. "I was no longer in
the grip of pain and hate; I was finally free. The day I forgave the Nazis,
privately I forgave my parents whom I hated all my life for not having saved
me from Auschwitz. Children expect their parents to protect them, mine
couldn't. And then I forgave myself for hating my parents. Forgiveness is
really nothing more than an act of self-healing and self-empowerment."
I'm afraid not. Forgiveness is, by definition, much more than a
self-centered act. What Kor is describing is closer to catharsis, a purging
of pain, a very different process - and one that not all Holocaust survivors
wish to experience. Elie Wiesel, for example, has remarked, "I want to keep
that pain; that zone of pain must stay inside me." While I did not suffer
from the ineffable horror of the concentration camps as Wiesel, my mother,
my murdered family members and so many others did, I know what he means. I,
too, want to hold onto my pain. It helps ensure that the past is always
present in me. It is an important part of what keeps me close to those I
lost and to the world that died with them.
It also helps me deal with questions that keep rattling around in my head.
For example, while the overwhelming majority of today's Germans obviously
were born after the Holocaust, do they nonetheless share guilt for the
actions (or inactions) of their parents and grandparents? I have family
members and friends who think not, who firmly believe that one can never
hold children guilty for the sins of their parents. I have even been called
some unpleasant names for holding an opposing view. I have noticed, however,
that such opinions usually come from people who did not suffer from the
Holocaust, who are a generation or two removed, and whose beliefs are rooted
in theory, not experience. I think that such people, good-hearted though
they may be, may find that the answer is not as simple as they think.
They are often among the first, after all, to insist on collective guilt for
atrocious episodes in our own nation's past - the horrors of slavery, the
slaughter of Native Americans, the World War II internment of Japanese
Americans and other acts committed in our name. Such American guilt has been
passed from generation to generation (though our forbears were in many cases
not even on these shores when the events occurred), and it has triggered
such public responses as affirmative action; Japanese-American reparations
payments; compensatory education, jobs and housing policies; and
repatriation of tribal graves and cultural property.
Like a number of other nations, today's Germany also struggles with
collective guilt for the sins of parents and grandparents. Germany's burden
is especially heavy, because it stems from what former German chancellor
Gerhard Schröder termed "the greatest crime in the history of mankind," the
ultimate sin. Nations cannot easily shed that kind of guilt, and certainly
not in a generation or two.
That's why Germany tries so hard, to this day, to make amends with the
Jewish community, a seemingly impossible job. It not only has made
restitution payments to a dwindling number of Holocaust survivors for more
than 60 years. It also stands behind Israel in the Middle East. It is Israel's
second-largest trading partner. It has encouraged the renewal of a sizable
Jewish community in Germany. It has built Holocaust memorials, created
Holocaust school curricula, maintained former concentration camps as
museums.
This is as it should be. If the pain of the past is always present in me, as
it is in many other survivors and their children, it does not trouble me
that contemporary Germans live with the hurt from that past as well. After
all, just as children inherit wealth and otherwise benefit from what their
parents achieve, so do they sometimes inherit their parents' debts,
including this one.
As for forgiveness, the truth is that I could not forgive today's Germans
even if I wanted to. While I never explained this to the young German woman
at my home that day, under Judaic law both the perpetrators and the
survivors must be alive to have even the possibility of forgiveness. It is
because of this, in fact, that some Jewish and Christian scholars have been
groping with the question of whether, when all of Hitler's henchmen and
their victims are gone, the Jewish community will have any ability to grant
forgiveness for the Holocaust. The answer seems to be that it will not. For
me, though, this is not a terribly difficult question to begin with: I
believe that the Holocaust is among what Moses Maimonides, in his Mishneh
Torah, the 12th-century compilation of Jewish religious law, suggested were
sins so hideous as to be beyond the realm of human forgiveness.
Nevertheless, many in the American Jewish community at least want to pursue
reconciliation, if not forgiveness, with others. They are understandably
eager to respond to Germany's gestures toward the Jewish community and
Israel, as well as to public statements of remorse by Protestant and
Catholic leaders for the mistreatment of Jews. I certainly endorse
reconciliation with Christian communities in general. I also understand the
importance of Jewish and Israeli links to Germany today, just as I
understand how U.S. national interests dictated that our main World War II
enemies, Germany and Japan, become our postwar allies or that today we have
shifting alliances with former foes like Russia and China. Such is the world
of realpolitik.
On a personal level, however, I feel quite differently. I have never sought
any restitution payments from Germany, and while I am mindful of how many
Jews in Germany today are from the former Soviet Union, I still find it hard
to comprehend why any Jew would want to live in that country. As for myself,
I will never again set foot on German soil. I flinch just hearing someone
talking German, the language I spoke myself when I first arrived in the
United States at age 7.
In short, then, there are obvious strategic and practical reasons for
reconciling and dealing with Germany. None, however, would move me to
forgive all Germans today even if I had the ability to do so. In the end
Germans will have to ask the Almighty for such absolution (though I sure
would like to be there to have my say during those conversations).
Anita Epstein, who is among the world's youngest Holocaust survivors, is
preparing her memoirs with the help of her journalist husband.
Independently Searching for the Truth since 1997.
MEMORY & JUSTICE
“...a society cannot know itself if it does not have an accurate memory of its own history.”
Youk Chhang, Director
Documentation Center of Cambodia
66 Sihanouk Blvd.,
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(156)
-
▼
June
(28)
- Genocide Educational Memorial: The Anti-Genocide S...
- Third Commune Teacher Training: Pursat, Siem Reap,...
- Former Khmer Rouge stronghold gets first textbook ...
- Cambodian schools to hang anti-genocide banners
- Can a Holocaust survivor ever forgive the Germans?
- Testing of KR history expanded in schools
- Seven Senior Bosnian Serb Officials Convicted of S...
- Reassuring the Khmer Krom
- Farina So: Breaking the silence on the Cambodian g...
- The International Criminal Court (ICC) Stocktaking...
- Investigators' spat reveals more divisions at Khme...
- Village Forum and Discussion on Khmer Kampuchea Kr...
- Forgiveness Is Difficult for Vork Ty
- LOOKING FOR MONTAGNARD MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN… w...
- ECCC: THE ROLE OF ASEAN
- Justice for the Khmer Krom
- In Cambodia, Verdict Nears in Khmer Rouge Genocide...
- Artist tells of survival in S-21
- Talking won't work with North Korea
- History Can Help National Healing: Professor
- Memorial Built for Prisoners Executed at Pagoda
- Nob Bunna: an Unforgettable Memory
- BOU MENG: A SURVIVOR FROM KHMER ROUGE PRISON S-21...
- Saing Sarin: Khmer Rouge Killed My Father
- Transitional justice essential for healing
- A Hidden History of Evil Why doesn’t anyone care a...
- Tribunal Prosecutor Allays Cham Concerns
- Center Seeks Recognition From Tribunal
-
▼
June
(28)
About Me
- Duong Dara
- Dara Duong was born in 1971 in Battambang province, Cambodia. His life changed forever at age four, when the Khmer Rouge took over the country in 1975. During the regime that controlled Cambodia from 1975-1979, Dara’s father, grandparents, uncle and aunt were executed, along with almost 3 million other Cambodians. Dara’s mother managed to keep him and his brothers and sisters together and survive the years of the Khmer Rouge regime. However, when the Vietnamese liberated Cambodia, she did not want to live under Communist rule. She fled with her family to a refugee camp on the Cambodian-Thai border, where they lived for more than ten years. Since arriving in the United States, Dara’s goal has been to educate people about the rich Cambodian culture that the Khmer Rouge tried to destroy and about the genocide, so that the world will not stand by and allow such atrocities to occur again. Toward that end, he has created the Cambodian Cultural Museum and Killing Fields Memorial, which began in his garage and is now in White Center, Washington. Dara’s story is one of survival against enormous odds, one of perseverance, one of courage and hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment